Ted Cruz falsely accuses Merrick Garland of acting out of malice towards Republicans


Who Allowed Ted Cruz to Make a Podcast? It might be worth getting rid of every existing podcast just to get rid of Ted Cruz’s disgustingly smug version of “listen to me, talk more,” aka “The Verdict.” Despite the fact that everyone knew impeachment was a very good possibility (based on Trump keeping Top-Secret SCI documents in his office in Mar-a-Lago and trying to overthrow the government), Cruz says this special council material is nothing but petty retribution because mean Republicans wouldn’t let Garland on the SCOTUS.

And Cruz goes so far as to say it’s a comedy, especially considering what we’ve just been through:

Merrick Garland is the most corrupt attorney general we’ve ever seen in terms of willingness to corrupt the Justice Department and FBI and use them as political weapons. And the fact that his response – Donald Trump announced as president, okay, ‘I’m appointing a special counsel, we’re going to charge you.’ That’s political. It’s not justice.

Why not wait to see if A) Trump is indicted, B) the allegations in the indictment, and C) the evidence presented?

ALSO READ  Musk's Twitter gets weird and wild, but Washington sticks around

Cruz’s sidekick Ben Ferguson then proved he could read minds:

“I’m going back to Garland, and you and I mentioned this recently, but I think it’s worth revisiting – Garland is the man who was very upset because he really believes he should be on the Supreme Court right now.

Cruz actually pushed back as Ferguson went ahead and called Garland a psychopath, but Cruz just disagreed because he wanted to shoot a little higher:

I’m going to put some pressure on you. I wouldn’t use a word like psychopath. l think it’s a combination of things. I don’t know Merrick Garland – I’ve met him a few times, but personally I don’t know him very well. I think he is a weak man. I think he is unwilling to stand up to the partisan hacks in the White House.

Those who refuse to comment on any part of the case and those Garland has said play no part in the case (Garland doesn’t at this point either).

ALSO READ  GOP goes on the offensive: Will subpoena Hunter Biden

“I think the White House is the corruption that – the fish rots from the head. It is the Biden White House that is fundamentally corrupt. But I do think Merrick Garland is different than one Eric Holder or a Loretta Lynch who were deep supporters.”

Garland is white.

“I actually think Garland justifies what he’s doing to himself. I think he believes he is not partial. I think he’s been drinking so much of the Kool-Aid that he’s a very self-righteous person.

By passing the case on to someone else to pass a neutral judgment? By deciding not to even make the decision? Do any of these people understand what they’re saying, or are they just throwing out words that sound good together?

ALSO READ  Trump suffers a major courtroom loss before announcing the 2024 campaign


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here