US judge calls Trump “Frankenstein monster” for Pennsylvania trial


The lawsuit was aimed at preventing officials from certifying Biden’s victory in the state. (File)


A federal judge on Saturday dismissed a lawsuit critical of President Donald Trump’s long-running attempt to overturn his Nov. 3 electoral defeat to Democratic President-elect Joe Biden, calling his legal demand a “Frankenstein monster.”

The Trump campaign had sought to prevent state officials from certifying the results of elections in the state.

US District Judge Matthew Brann in Williamsport, Pa., Described the case as “strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations.”

Brann, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama, said he “does not have the power to take away the right to vote from even one person, let alone millions of citizens.”

Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani said in a statement he was disappointed with the decision. “Today’s decision is helping us in our strategy to get to the US Supreme Court quickly,” he said.

ALSO READ  What could happen if the result of the US election is contested?

According to Giuliani, the campaign will ask the 3rd U.S. Circuit Philadelphia Court of Appeals to review the decision on an accelerated schedule. The majority of the judges in this circuit have been appointed by Republican presidents. Four were nominated by Trump.

The lawsuit before Brann was filed on Nov. 9 and had alleged inconsistent treatment by county election officials of the mail-in ballots. Some counties have informed voters that they can fix minor flaws such as missing “secret envelopes”, while others have not.

“This claim, like Frankenstein’s monster, was stitched up at random,” Brann wrote.

For Trump to have any hope of quashing the election, he must reverse the result in Pennsylvania, which is expected to be certified by state officials on Monday.


“Today’s decision is a victory for the rule of law and for the voters of Pennsylvania, whom the Trump campaign has sought to deny their rights over the most fragile legal theory imaginable,” the expert wrote. electoral law Rick Hasen on Twitter.

ALSO READ  Turkey earthquake: 6 dead as strong tremors hit Aegean Sea

The Trump campaign and its supporters have filed dozens of lawsuits in six closely contested states. The campaign’s only victories have extended election day voting hours at a handful of polling stations in Nevada and set aside some provisional polls in Pennsylvania, court records show.

Attempts to thwart election certification have failed in courts in Georgia, Michigan and Arizona.

In the Pennsylvania case, Brann also rejected a campaign request to amend the trial to allege violations of the US Constitution. The campaign wanted Brann to allow the Pennsylvania Republican-controlled state legislature to nominate voters who would support Trump in the Electoral College vote on December 14.

ALSO READ  Margaret Brennan on first presidential debate: 'I would love our country to have a serious conversation about our leadership'

Under Pennsylvania law, the candidate who wins the popular vote in the state gets all the electoral votes in the state.

A presidential candidate needs 270 electoral votes to win the election, and Biden leads the electoral vote count by 306-232.

Electoral votes are distributed among the 50 states and the District of Columbia based approximately on population.

(Except for the title, this story was not edited by The Bharat Express News staff and is posted Platforms.)



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here